Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Steady across opponent tiers — no big drop against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 10 | 12 |
| Tackles /90 | 0.90 | 0.68 | 0.86 |
| Interceptions /90 | 0.90 | 1.58 | 1.34 |
| Blocks /90 | 1.00 | 0.79 | 0.48 |
| Duels won /90 | 3.50 | 3.94 | 3.91 |
| Pass accuracy | 80.7% | 90.3% | 87.1% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Middle of his age group: 52nd percentile for ball winning among defenders aged 24–28.
vs defenders aged 24–28 · 276 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like J. Siebert — defenders with this shape at 26.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Rising asset — up 567% over the last year, at a career high.
Top underlying game: 0.23 xG away to Middlesbrough.