Underperforming xG by 3 — the chances are there; finishing should catch up.
Small sample — 13 apps, 659 min. Treat the percentiles with caution.
Open-play threat: 100% of his non-penalty output comes in open play.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 4 | 5 | 4 |
| Goals /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Assists /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shots /90 | 1.77 | 0.48 | 1.33 |
| Key passes /90 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.33 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.00 | 0.48 | 0.33 |
Cooling: finishing and shot threat down vs last season at 26.
Middle of his age group: 46th percentile for shot threat among forwards aged 24–28.
vs forwards aged 24–28 · 266 peers · pool pct → age band| Season | Team | League | Min | Apps | G/90 | A/90 | Sh/90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Pisa | Serie A | 659 | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.23 |
| 2023-24 | SV Darmstadt 98 | Bundesliga | 147 | 6 | 0.30 | 0.00 | 2.73 |
Profiles like F. Camarda — forwards with this shape at 26.
Watch the downside: creation (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Value sliding — down 60% over the last year.
Top underlying game: 0.80 xG vs Lecce.