Steps out and wins it. Again. And again.
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Shows up against the best — output holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 3 | 4 | 8 |
| Tackles /90 | 2.33 | 1.00 | 1.26 |
| Interceptions /90 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 2.05 |
| Blocks /90 | 0.67 | 0.50 | 0.63 |
| Duels won /90 | 5.00 | 4.75 | 4.26 |
| Pass accuracy | 89.0% | 90.0% | 94.6% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Ahead of his age group: 88th percentile for ball winning among defenders aged 24–28.
vs defenders aged 24–28 · 276 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like E. Cömert — defenders with this shape at 26.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Value sliding — down 42% over the last year.
Top underlying game: 0.43 xG away to Kasımpaşa.