Leading trait
Involvement
Involvement44
Control35
Ball Winning33
Top rating44Percentile
Identity
Tackles won
—
Interceptions
0.66(10)
Aerials won
0.00(0)
Touches
0.0
- Errors → shot / 90Top 1%
- Duels won / 90Top 25%
- Pass accuracy %Bottom 1%
- Touches / 90Bottom 1%
- Ball recoveries / 90Bottom 1%
- Clearances / 90Bottom 1%
Validation
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Goals vs xG0 · 0.4
Assists vs xA1 · 0.2
PenaltiesNo goals this season
Trajectory
Middle of his age group: 42nd percentile for involvement among defenders aged 26–30.
vs defenders aged 26–30 · 258 peers · pool pct → age bandInvolvement
4442nd
-2Control
3532nd
-3Projection
Profiles like G. van Zwam — defenders with this shape at 28.
G. van ZwamGO Ahead Eagles · Eredivisie
94match
N. VerschurenFC Volendam · Eredivisie
92match
L. BartlettDC United · Major League Soccer
92match
Joaquín FernándezSporting Kansas City · Major League Soccer
91match
D. CoppolaParis FC · Ligue 1
90match
NatanReal Betis · La Liga
90match
R. BazoerKonyaspor · Süper Lig
90match
M. Elimbi GilbertGIL Vicente · Primeira Liga
90match
Risk
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Weakest traits for the role
Aerial1
Sweeping1
Distribution1
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Steady — recent form is in line with his season rate across all 4 tracked stats.
Availability17 apps · 1,374 min · ~81/game — last 5: ~90 min/gameMinutes risk · medium — starts 88% of available games, 1374 minutes played
Market value
Valuation holding steady.
Current value
€250K
Peak value
€2.0M
Jan 2011
Career transfers
0
Market-value timeline
31 valuations · AS OF 06 MAY 2026Match evidence
Top underlying game: 0.10 xG vs FC Dallas.
Biggest underlying gamesxGxGOTG
vs FC Dallas0.100.000
vs Colorado Rapids0.090.000
vs Seattle Sounders0.040.00010 of 19 matches