Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Open-play threat: 100% of his non-penalty output comes in open play.
Flat-track: production drops sharply against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 13 | 11 | 10 |
| Goals /90 | 0.00 | 0.15 | 0.51 |
| Assists /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shots /90 | 0.92 | 0.74 | 1.69 |
| Key passes /90 | 1.38 | 1.19 | 0.51 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.46 | 0.00 | 0.17 |
Rising: progression and movement up sharply vs last season.
Middle of his age group: 67th percentile for movement among forwards aged 22–26.
vs forwards aged 22–26 · 259 peers · pool pct → age band| Season | Team | League | Min | Apps | G/90 | A/90 | Sh/90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Lecce | Serie A | 1,725 | 34 | 0.23 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| 2022-23 | Radnicki NIS | UEFA Europa Conference League | 136 | 2 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Profiles like T. van Gilst — forwards with this shape at 24.
Watch the downside: pressing (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Rising asset — up 800% over the last year.
Best underlying game: 1.04 xG vs Cremonese — and he took it, 1 goal.