Up and down all day — tackles, carries, repeats.
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Steady across opponent tiers — no big drop against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 11 | 6 | 8 |
| Tackles /90 | 1.58 | 4.50 | 1.12 |
| Interceptions /90 | 1.11 | 1.04 | 1.28 |
| Blocks /90 | 1.02 | 0.35 | 0.16 |
| Duels won /90 | 8.27 | 11.08 | 4.65 |
| Pass accuracy | 84.8% | 88.3% | 89.2% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite for his age: 99th percentile for ball winning among U23 defenders.
vs U23 defenders · 139 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like M. Nagida — defenders with this shape at 23.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Value sliding — down 38% over the last year.
Top underlying game: 0.37 xG vs Utrecht.