As likely to make the goal as take it.
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Steady across opponent tiers — no big drop against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 14 | 12 | 14 |
| Goals /90 | 0.16 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Assists /90 | 0.00 | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Shots /90 | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.13 |
| Key passes /90 | 1.03 | 1.46 | 1.74 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.79 | 0.64 | 1.48 |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite among his peers: 91st percentile for finishing among midfielders aged 22–26.
vs midfielders aged 22–26 · 284 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like Y. Suzuki — midfielders with this shape at 24.
Watch the downside: progression (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Best underlying game: 1.32 xG vs QPR — and he took it, 1 goal.