Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Small sample — 15 apps, 722 min. Treat the percentiles with caution.
Shows up against the best — output holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 3 | 6 | 4 |
| Goals /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| Assists /90 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shots /90 | 0.00 | 0.61 | 0.44 |
| Key passes /90 | 1.64 | 1.53 | 0.00 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 1.76 |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite among his peers: 95th percentile for movement among forwards aged 22–26.
vs forwards aged 22–26 · 259 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like Landerson — forwards with this shape at 24.
Watch the downside: shot threat (4th pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Value sliding — down 57% over the last year.
Top underlying game: 0.11 xG vs Rio Ave.