Never rushed, never rash — everything tidy.
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Steady across opponent tiers — no big drop against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 9 | 8 | 8 |
| Tackles /90 | 0.89 | 0.81 | 0.93 |
| Interceptions /90 | 0.56 | 1.30 | 0.53 |
| Blocks /90 | 0.89 | 1.30 | 0.27 |
| Duels won /90 | 3.33 | 2.76 | 2.80 |
| Pass accuracy | 91.8% | 89.7% | 89.0% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Rising: control and involvement up sharply vs last season.
Middle of his age group: 66th percentile for involvement among U23 defenders.
vs U23 defenders · 139 peers · pool pct → age band| Season | Team | League | Min | Apps | Tk/90 | Int/90 | KP/90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Twente | Eredivisie | 2,040 | 25 | 0.93 | 0.75 | 0.26 |
| 2024-25 | Twente | UEFA Europa League | 374 | 8 | 3.13 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
| 2023-24 | Shakhtar Donetsk | UEFA Champions League | 65 | 1 | 1.38 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Profiles like C. Rindov — defenders with this shape at 23.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Rising asset — up 233% over the last year, at a career high.
Top underlying game: 0.15 xG vs Telstar.