Leading trait
Aerial
Aerial1
Sweeping1
Distribution1
Top rating1Percentile
Identity
Tackles won
—
Interceptions
1.74(6)
Aerials won
0.00(0)
Touches
0.0
- Pass accuracy %Bottom 1%
- Prog. carries / 90Bottom 1%
- Passes / 90Bottom 1%
- Touches / 90Bottom 1%
Validation
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Goals vs xG0 · 0.0
Assists vs xA0 · 0.0
PenaltiesNo goals this season
Small sample — 7 apps, 311 min. Treat the percentiles with caution.
Trajectory
Holding a steady profile vs last season at 23.
2025-26 → 2026-27 · percentile shift
Ball Winning
921
-91Involvement
471
-46Control
361
-35Take-Ons
281
-27| Season | Team | League | Min | Apps | Tk/90 | Int/90 | KP/90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-27 | FC Cincinnati | Major League Soccer | 311 | 7 | 2.32 | 1.74 | 0.00 |
| 2025-26 | FC Cincinnati | Major League Soccer | 1,240 | 17 | 2.83 | 1.02 | 0.15 |
Projection
Profiles like O. Makhanya — defenders with this shape at 23.
O. MakhanyaPhiladelphia Union · Major League Soccer
89match
Victor GabrielInternacional · Serie A
79match
F. SurmanPortland Timbers · Major League Soccer
77match
Wyatt MeyerSporting Kansas City · Major League Soccer
75match
J. ForyPortland Timbers · Major League Soccer
75match
Z. MonlouisToronto FC · Major League Soccer
73match
Arthur DiasAtletico Paranaense · Serie A
73match
E. MoralesCF Montreal · Major League Soccer
72match
Risk
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Weakest traits for the role
Aerial1
Sweeping1
Distribution1
Availability7 apps · 311 min · ~44/game — last 5: ~0 min/gameMinutes risk · high — starts 57% of available games, 311 minutes played
Market value
Current value
—
Peak value
—
Career transfers
0
Match evidence
Top underlying game: 0.01 xG vs Toronto FC.
Biggest underlying gamesxGxGOTG
vs Toronto FC0.010.00010 of 14 matches