Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Balanced sources: 88% open play, 12% set pieces.
Shows up against the best — output holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 13 | 12 | 12 |
| Tackles /90 | 1.95 | 1.52 | 1.61 |
| Interceptions /90 | 0.70 | 0.27 | 0.30 |
| Blocks /90 | 0.31 | 0.09 | 0.10 |
| Duels won /90 | 2.42 | 3.39 | 4.12 |
| Pass accuracy | 72.0% | 71.0% | 68.5% |
Middle of his age group: 53rd percentile for ball winning among defenders aged 24–28.
vs defenders aged 24–28 · 276 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like M. Farfan — defenders with this shape at 26.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Valuation holding steady.
Top underlying game: 0.24 xG vs Bologna.