Overperforming xG by +2 — output is a touch ahead of the underlying numbers.
Shows up against the best — output holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 14 | 6 | 12 |
| Tackles /90 | 1.64 | 1.83 | 1.91 |
| Interceptions /90 | 0.70 | 1.00 | 0.48 |
| Key passes /90 | 1.10 | 1.17 | 1.24 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.78 | 1.17 | 0.77 |
| Pass accuracy | 82.4% | 83.2% | 80.1% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Middle of his age group: 61st percentile for take-ons among midfielders aged 23–27.
vs midfielders aged 23–27 · 282 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like Victor Mow Froholdt — midfielders with this shape at 25.
Watch the downside: progression (4th pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Valuation holding steady.
Top underlying game: 0.72 xG vs PSV Eindhoven.