Up and down all day — tackles, carries, repeats.
Overperforming xG by +2 — output is a touch ahead of the underlying numbers.
Shows up against the best — output holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Tackles /90 | 1.57 | 1.55 | 1.70 |
| Interceptions /90 | 1.57 | 1.55 | 0.93 |
| Blocks /90 | 0.26 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Duels won /90 | 3.40 | 3.99 | 4.18 |
| Pass accuracy | 83.5% | 82.0% | 88.7% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Middle of his age group: 64th percentile for take-ons among defenders aged 25–29.
vs defenders aged 25–29 · 275 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like I. Feingold — defenders with this shape at 27.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Rising asset — up 50% over the last year.
Best underlying game: 0.97 xG vs Rangers — and he took it, 1 goal.