Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Flat-track: production drops sharply against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 12 | 8 | 9 |
| Goals /90 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.20 |
| Assists /90 | 0.11 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
| Shots /90 | 0.46 | 2.05 | 1.43 |
| Key passes /90 | 0.92 | 2.05 | 1.22 |
| Take-ons /90 | 1.03 | 2.05 | 1.22 |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite among his peers: 97th percentile for progression among forwards aged 24–28.
vs forwards aged 24–28 · 266 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like A. Daghim — forwards with this shape at 26.
Watch the downside: pressing (4th pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Value sliding — down 43% over the last year.
Top underlying game: 0.71 xG away to Preston, 1 goal.