Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Small sample — 14 apps, 748 min. Treat the percentiles with caution.
Shows up against the best — production holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 5 | 5 | 4 |
| Goals /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Assists /90 | 0.25 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shots /90 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 2.21 |
| Key passes /90 | 2.23 | 0.41 | 1.10 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.50 | 0.41 | 1.10 |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite among his peers: 97th percentile for movement among forwards aged 22–26.
vs forwards aged 22–26 · 259 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like M. Jurásek — forwards with this shape at 24.
Watch the downside: finishing (5th pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Valuation holding steady.
Top underlying game: 0.22 xG vs Excelsior.