As likely to make the goal as take it.
Overperforming xG by +3 — output is a touch ahead of the underlying numbers.
Shows up against the best — output holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 8 | 6 | 9 |
| Tackles /90 | 1.16 | 0.41 | 0.63 |
| Interceptions /90 | 0.17 | 0.41 | 0.75 |
| Key passes /90 | 2.31 | 2.44 | 2.00 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.50 | 1.02 | 0.88 |
| Pass accuracy | 85.6% | 86.3% | 87.6% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite among his peers: 98th percentile for creation among midfielders aged 28–32.
vs midfielders aged 28–32 · 197 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like M. Hartel — midfielders with this shape at 30.
Watch the downside: ball winning (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Valuation holding steady.
Best underlying game: 1.21 xG away to Rizespor — and he took it, 2 goals.