Overperforming xG by +2 — output is a touch ahead of the underlying numbers.
Steady across opponent tiers — no big drop against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 9 | 8 | 9 |
| Goals /90 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.16 |
| Assists /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 |
| Shots /90 | 1.99 | 1.49 | 1.27 |
| Key passes /90 | 0.83 | 0.56 | 1.27 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.83 | 1.49 | 1.59 |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite among his peers: 92nd percentile for movement among forwards aged 29–33.
vs forwards aged 29–33 · 117 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like A. Danjuma — forwards with this shape at 31.
Watch the downside: pressing (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Value sliding — down 33% over the last year.
Top underlying game: 0.23 xG vs Kayserispor.