Steps out and wins it. Again. And again.
Underperforming xG by 3 — the chances are there; finishing should catch up.
Shows up against the best — output holds against top-third opponents.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 10 | 11 | 11 |
| Tackles /90 | 1.30 | 0.95 | 1.27 |
| Interceptions /90 | 1.10 | 0.86 | 0.73 |
| Blocks /90 | 0.50 | 0.57 | 0.82 |
| Duels won /90 | 5.80 | 6.47 | 5.91 |
| Pass accuracy | 80.2% | 86.4% | 84.8% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Ahead of his age group: 80th percentile for ball winning among defenders aged 24–28.
vs defenders aged 24–28 · 276 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like L. Østigård — defenders with this shape at 26.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Best underlying game: 0.72 xG away to Middlesbrough — and he took it, 2 goals.