Never rushed, never rash — everything tidy.
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Small sample — 11 apps, 843 min. Treat the percentiles with caution.
Steady across opponent tiers — no big drop against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Tackles /90 | 0.72 | 0.40 | 0.98 |
| Interceptions /90 | 0.36 | 2.40 | 0.00 |
| Blocks /90 | 0.72 | 0.80 | 0.49 |
| Duels won /90 | 1.80 | 3.60 | 3.91 |
| Pass accuracy | 89.0% | 85.2% | 90.9% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Cooling: control and involvement down vs last season at 25.
Ahead of his age group: 77th percentile for involvement among defenders aged 23–27.
vs defenders aged 23–27 · 271 peers · pool pct → age band| Season | Team | League | Min | Apps | Tk/90 | Int/90 | KP/90 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Arouca | Primeira Liga | 843 | 11 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.32 |
| 2024-25 | Arouca | Primeira Liga | 300 | 10 | 1.20 | 0.60 | 0.00 |
| 2023-24 | Arouca | Primeira Liga | 571 | 25 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.00 |
Profiles like J. Medić — defenders with this shape at 25.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Valuation holding steady.
Top underlying game: 0.04 xG vs FC Porto.