Shoots relentlessly — and buries them.
Underperforming xG by 2 — the chances are there; finishing should catch up.
Flat-track: production drops sharply against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 12 | 7 | 12 |
| Goals /90 | 0.24 | 0.85 | 0.54 |
| Assists /90 | 0.00 | 0.85 | 0.00 |
| Shots /90 | 3.08 | 2.97 | 2.53 |
| Key passes /90 | 0.24 | 2.55 | 0.54 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.00 | 0.42 | 0.18 |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite for his age: 99th percentile for shot threat among U23 forwards.
vs U23 forwards · 149 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like E. Simms — forwards with this shape at 22.
Watch the downside: pressing (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Rising asset — up 1100% over the last year, at a career high.
Best underlying game: 1.28 xG vs Heerenveen — and he took it, 1 goal.