Up and down all day — tackles, carries, repeats.
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Small sample — 13 apps, 553 min. Treat the percentiles with caution.
Flat-track: production drops sharply against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 4 | 3 | 4 |
| Tackles /90 | 0.00 | 1.54 | 1.34 |
| Interceptions /90 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 0.67 |
| Blocks /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Duels won /90 | 4.03 | 6.69 | 6.04 |
| Pass accuracy | 96.8% | 90.3% | 90.2% |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Ahead of his age group: 82nd percentile for take-ons among defenders aged 25–29.
vs defenders aged 25–29 · 275 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like M. de Wit — defenders with this shape at 27.
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
At a career-high valuation.
Top underlying game: 0.21 xG vs Millwall.