Lives where the ball is about to land.
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Balanced sources: 89% open play, 11% set pieces.
Flat-track: production drops sharply against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 14 | 9 | 13 |
| Goals /90 | 0.00 | 0.73 | 0.82 |
| Assists /90 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Shots /90 | 0.75 | 1.46 | 2.06 |
| Key passes /90 | 0.54 | 1.65 | 0.41 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.11 | 0.18 | 0.14 |
Ahead of his age group: 83rd percentile for finishing among forwards aged 24–28.
vs forwards aged 24–28 · 266 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like L. Kjerrumgaard — forwards with this shape at 26.
Watch the downside: pressing (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Valuation holding steady.
Best underlying game: 0.92 xG vs Athletic Club — and he took it, 1 goal.