Leading trait
Take-Ons
Take-Ons62
Involvement10
Control5
Top rating62Percentile
Identity
Tackles won
—
Interceptions
0.18(1)
Aerials won
0.23(1)
Touches
61.4
- Errors → shot / 90Top 1%
- xA / 90Top 5%
- Key passes / 90Top 10%
- Take-ons succeeded / 90Top 25%
- Ball recoveries / 90Top 25%
- Pass accuracy %Bottom 1%
- Interceptions / 90Bottom 1%
- Duels total / 90Bottom 1%
- Aerials won / 90Bottom 1%
Validation
Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Goals vs xG0 · 0.1
Assists vs xA0 · 0.9
PenaltiesNo goals this season
Small sample — 9 apps, 489 min. Treat the percentiles with caution.
Trajectory
Middle of his age group: 67th percentile for take-ons among defenders aged 27–31.
vs defenders aged 27–31 · 230 peers · pool pct → age bandTake-Ons
6267th
+5Involvement
107th
-3Projection
Profiles like Vanderlan — defenders with this shape at 29.
Risk
Watch the downside: aerial (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Weakest traits for the role
Aerial1
Sweeping1
Distribution1
Availability9 apps · 489 min · ~54/game — last 5: ~2 min/gameMinutes risk · high — starts 67% of available games, 489 minutes played
Market value
Current value
—
Peak value
—
Career transfers
0
Match evidence
Top underlying game: 0.06 xG vs Charlotte.
Biggest underlying gamesxGxGOTG
vs Charlotte0.060.00010 of 30 matches