Underperforming xG by 3 — the chances are there; finishing should catch up.
Balanced sources: 90% open play, 10% set pieces.
Steady across opponent tiers — no big drop against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 6 | 9 | 7 |
| Goals /90 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.00 |
| Assists /90 | 0.00 | 0.41 | 0.70 |
| Shots /90 | 1.80 | 2.44 | 1.58 |
| Key passes /90 | 3.15 | 3.66 | 4.04 |
| Take-ons /90 | 0.23 | 1.22 | 2.11 |
Elite among his peers: 99th percentile for creation among midfielders aged 30–34.
vs midfielders aged 30–34 · 131 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like L. Samardžić — midfielders with this shape at 32.
Watch the downside: ball winning (18th pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Value sliding — down 38% over the last year.
Should have had more: 0.99 xG away to AC Milan, but no goal.