Output is real: finishing sits in line with xG.
Flat-track: production drops sharply against the top third.
| Stat | Top third | Middle | Bottom third |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matches | 11 | 10 | 11 |
| Goals /90 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 0.58 |
| Assists /90 | 0.10 | 0.11 | 0.19 |
| Shots /90 | 1.25 | 2.50 | 2.31 |
| Key passes /90 | 1.88 | 1.59 | 0.77 |
| Take-ons /90 | 1.57 | 1.02 | 1.15 |
Adjustment v1.1 · calibrated against 1401 league transitions + 1004 cross-league cup fixtures · methodology
Elite among his peers: 97th percentile for movement among forwards aged 29–33.
vs forwards aged 29–33 · 117 peers · pool pct → age bandProfiles like Mikel Oyarzabal — forwards with this shape at 31.
Watch the downside: pressing (1st pct) is a real weakness for the role.
Reliable: form in line with his season rate — no meaningful swings.
Valuation holding steady.
Best underlying game: 1.06 xG vs AVS — and he took it, 1 goal.